Changes between Version 8 and Version 9 of Energy expenditure
- Timestamp:
- Sep 1, 2010 11:45:02 AM (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Energy expenditure
v8 v9 3 3 4 4 = Some explanation = 5 ______________________ 5 ------------------- 6 6 7 7 work as Distance*Elevation Crossin et al. 2004 or something more ? 8 8 9 9 Van Ginneken et al. (2008) estimate a cost of transport (COT)in kj.kg-1.km-1 do the amount of energy will be proportional to the distance covered by silver eel. It makes sense to say that the energy expenditure is relative to the distance covered (E1) 10 11 ______________________ 10 ----------------------- 12 11 Après avoir regardé la publi indiquée par Laurent, il semble que l'hypothèse que l'énergie soit relative à la distance est juste 13 12 … … 31 30 Epe+ Esm=R*D +Mt=R*D+M*D/V 32 31 =a/2*Af*Cd*V*D+M*D/V on retrouve bien pour une vitesse relative constante une grandeur relative à la distance parcourue 33 ___________________________________ 32 -------------------- 34 33 The additional distance linked to altitude (water current) is relative to 35 34 Vitesse d'écoulement :
