Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of Eda Description


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 11, 2010 3:25:28 PM (15 years ago)
Author:
laurent
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Eda Description

    v6 v7  
    1 = Eel Density Analysis (EDA 2.0): A statistic model to assess European eel (Anguilla Anguilla) escapement in river networks. = 
     1= Eel Density Analysis (EDA 2.0): A statistic model to assess European eel (Anguilla Anguilla) escapement in a river network. = 
    22 
    33 
    44Since the early 1980s, the European eel ('' Anguilla anguilla '') stock has been declining and continues to decline at an alarming rate. It is presently considered to be outside safe biological limits (ICES 1999). 
    55 
    6 ''' EDA 2.0 (Eel Density Analysis) ''' is a modelling tool based on a geolocalized river network database to predict yellow eel densities and silver eel escapement. The principle of this approach is (1) to relate observed yellow eel densities to different parameters: sampling method, environmental conditions (distance to the sea, relative distance, temperature, Strahler stream order, elevation and slope…), anthropogenic conditions (obstacles, fisheries, …) and time (year trends), (2) to calculate the yellow eel density in each reach of river networks by applying the statistical model calibrated in step 1, (3) to calculate the overall yellow eel stock abundance by multiplying these densities by the surfaces of the reaches and by summing them (4) to calculate a potential silver eel escapement by converting the yellow eel stock estimated in step 3 into silver eel stock (5) when silver eel mortalities (fisheries, turbines) are know (are estimated) they can be used to assess the silver eel escapement (not yet implemented). 
     6''' EDA 2.0 (Eel Density Analysis) ''' is a modelling tool based on a geolocalized river network database to predict yellow eel densities and silver eel escapement. The principle of this approach is (1) to relate observed yellow eel densities to different parameters: sampling method, environmental conditions (distance to the sea, relative distance, temperature, Strahler stream order, elevation and slope…), anthropogenic conditions (obstacles, fisheries, …) and time (year trends), (2) to calculate the yellow eel density in each reach of river the network by applying the statistical model calibrated in step 1, (3) to calculate the overall yellow eel stock abundance by multiplying these densities by the surfaces of the reaches and by summing them (4) to calculate a potential silver eel escapement by converting the yellow eel stock estimated in step 3 into silver eel stock (5) when silver eel mortalities (fisheries, turbines) are know (are estimated) they can be used to assess the silver eel escapement (not yet implemented). 
    77It is also possible to give an estimate of the pristine escapement by running the EDA model with anthropogenic conditions artificially set to zero and time variable sets before 1980. 
    88 
    99It presently runs with BD_Carthage®, a spatial referencing system for surface water in France and will be tested on two European hydrographical databases, CCM v2.1 (Catchment Characterisation and Modelling) (Vogt et al. 2007) and Ecrins (European Catchment and RIvers Network System). 
    10 The presence/absence and densities of yellow eel in France are obtained from the Aquatic environment and fish database (BDMAP - more than 16,000 fishing samples collected on more than 6,000/8,968 (?) sampling stations (cf.coordination juillet 2008)) from the National Office of Water and the Aquatic Environments (ONEMA) and other databases from the Brittany watershed. 
     10The presence/absence and densities of yellow eel in France are obtained from the Aquatic environment and fish database (BDMAP - more than 11 787 fishing samples used collected on 6 007 sampling stations) from the French National Office of Water and the Aquatic Environments (ONEMA) and other databases from the Brittany watershed. 
    1111 
    12 Values of the explanatory variables are calculated for each segment of the river network. The distance to the sea, the relative distance (between sea limit and the more upstream source) are directly calculated from the river network topology. The temperatures are extracted from the CRU (Mitchell et al., 2004), and Worlclim (www.worldclim.org/). Elevation and slope are extracted from the National Height Elevation Database (BD ALTI® - spatial resolution of 50m) from the National Geographic Institute. The obstacle pressure (characteristics, Steinbach rank…) comes from the National list of obstacles to river flows (ROE) from the ONEMA. Glass eel fisheries data set comes from Castelnaud (1994), non-professional/leisure fisheries data set from the ONEMA and professional fisheries data set from Thomas Changeux and Wenes (2004). 
    13 The data sets used to extract the water quality parameters (which ones?) are obtained from the ROM or/and ? the RHP from the ONEMA. 
     12Values of the explanatory variables are calculated for each segment of the river network. The distance to the sea, the relative distance (between sea limit and the more upstream source) are directly calculated from the river network topology. The temperatures are extracted from the CRU (Mitchell et al., 2004), and Worlclim (www.worldclim.org/). Elevation and slope are extracted from the National Height Elevation Database (BD ALTI® - spatial resolution of 50m) from the National Geographic Institute. The obstacle pressure (characteristics, Steinbach rank…) comes from the National list of obstacles to river flows (ROE) from the ONEMA. Glass eel fisheries data set comes from Castelnaud (1994), non-professional/leisure fisheries and professional fisheries data setfrom the ONEMA. 
     13The data sets used to extract the water quality parameters are obtained from the ROM database of ONEMA. 
    1414 
    1515The statistical model is calibrated with a Generalized Additive Model (Hastie and Tibshirani, 1990), using the ‘gam’ library in the R software. This semi-parametric extension of generalised linear models is flexible and allows combination of both linear and complex additive responses within the same model. The best model is selected by the Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), and Kappa coefficient when presence-absence models were used. 
     
    1717For technical reasons, silver eel densities are unachievable and exhaustive samplings are rare, so an indirect method is used to estimate the silver eel stock from the knowledge of the yellow eel stock. The silver eel stock is obtained with a conversion rate which will be calibrated according to known silver eel productions. 
    1818 
    19 Within the POSE project, this EDA 2.0 model will be implemented in at least four geographical areas: the Brittany region (Leprévost, 2007), the Loire-Brittany basin (Hoffmann, 2008) , the Rhône and Vaccares basins, and the  Basque country river basins. For management purpose, it will also be implemented across all of France (Beaulaton in French EMP). The implementation of the model in Loire Brittany allowed to predict the impact of river obstacles on densities, and test the obstacles grid from Pierre Steinbach.  
    20  
     19EDA 1.0 has been implemented in the Brittany region (Leprévost, 2007)and the Loire-Brittany basin (Hoffmann, 2008). This implementation of the model allowed to predict the impact of river obstacles on densities, and test the obstacles grid from Pierre Steinbach. For management purpose, it has also been implemented at the France scale (Beaulaton, in French EMP). Within the POSE project, this EDA 2.0 model should be implemented in at six geographical areas.  
    2120 
    2221REFERENCES